The brand new Salvadoran Peoples Rights Commission: Data Control, Research Representation, and you can Promoting Logical Profile

The brand new Salvadoran Peoples Rights Commission: Data Control, Research Representation, and you can Promoting Logical Profile

Baseball, P. (2000). Inside P. Golf ball, H. F. Spirer, & L. Spirer (Eds.), Putting some Circumstances: Investigating Large scale Peoples Liberties Violations Playing with Advice Possibilities and you can Study Study. AAAS.

Belin, T. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). A method to own calibrating not the case-suits pricing in number linkage. Journal of one’s American Statistical Relationship, 90(430), 694–707.

Bilenko, Yards., & Mooney, R. J. (2003). Transformative Duplicate Identification Using Learnable String Similarity Measures. In KDD ’03 (pp. 39–48). ACM.

Christen, P. (2008). Automatic Checklist Linkage Having fun with Seeded Nearby Neighbour and you may Support Vector Machine Group. In the KDD ’08 (pp. 151–159). ACM.

Christen, P. (2012). A study out-of indexing approaches for scalable list linkage and you may deduplication. IEEE Transactions into the Degree and you can Data Technology, 24(9), 1537–1555.

Cohen, W., Raviku). An evaluation out of sequence metrics to seksi Cartagena Еѕene have coordinating brands and facts. Inside KDD workshop to your investigation clean and you may target consolidation (Vol. step 3, pp. 73–78).

Copas, J., & Hilton, F. (1990). Listing linkage: Analytical activities having complimentary pc info. Record of your own Regal Mathematical Society, Series Good, 153(3), 287–320.

Dai, A beneficial. Yards., & Storkey, A good. J. (2011). The fresh new grouped creator-situation design to possess unsupervised entity resolution. For the Artificial neural companies and machine studying–icann 2011 (pp. 241–249). Springer.

Fortini, Meters., Liseo, B., Nuccitelli, A great., & Scanu, M. (2001). To your Bayesian List Linkage. Research from inside the Certified Statistics, 4(1), 185–198.

Gutman, R., Afendulis, C., & Zaslavsky, An effective. (2013). Good bayesian process of document connecting to analyze end- of-lifetime medical will cost you. Record of the American Mathematical Organization, 108(501), 34–47.

Hsu, W., Lee, M. L., Liu, B., & Ling, T. W. (2000). Exploration Mining inside Diabetic patients Database: Conclusions and you can Results. In KDD ’00 (pp. 430–436). ACM.

A torn-merge Markov chain Monte Carlo procedure of the fresh new Dirichlet techniques blend design

Jewell, N. P., Spagat, Meters., & Jewell, B. L. (2013). MSE and you may Casualty Counts: Assumptions, Translation, and you will Challenges. During the T. B. Seybolt, J. D. Aronson, & B. Fischhoff (Eds.), Relying Civilian Casualties: An overview of Recording and you may Quoting Nonmilitary Fatalities incompatible. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Larsen, M. D. (2002)ments towards the Hierarchical Bayesian Record Linkage. When you look at the Procedures of your own mutual statistical conferences, point to your questionnaire look measures (pp. 1995–2000). New Western Statistical Relationship.

Steorts, R

Larsen, Meters. D. (2005). Advances when you look at the Checklist Linkage Idea: Hierarchical Bayesian Checklist Linkage Principle. In the Proceedings of the joint analytical conferences, area on survey browse tips (pp. 3277–3284). The newest Western Mathematical Organization.

Larsen, M. D., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Iterative automatic list linkage playing with blend activities. Diary of Western Analytical Association, 96(453), 32–41.

Lum, K., Rate, M. Age., & Banking institutions, D. (2013). Apps out of Multiple Assistance Quote when you look at the Individual Rights Search. The American Statistician, 67(4), 191–200.

Marchant, N. Grams., C., Kaplan, An effective., Rubinstein, B. I. P., & Elazar, D. Letter. (2019). D-blink: Delivered prevent-to-end bayesian organization solution.

McCallum, Good., & Wellner, B. (2004). Conditional Type Title Uncertainty that have App to Noun Coreference. For the Improves from inside the sensory advice handling systems (nips ’04) (pp. 905–912). MIT Push.

Miller, P. L., Frawley, S. J., & Sayward, F. G. (2000). IMM/Scrub: A website-Particular Product toward Deduplication out-of Vaccination Records Info within the Teens Immunization Registriesputers and you may Biomedical Research, 33(2), 126–143.

Murphy, J., Brackbill, R. Meters., Thalji, L., Dolan, Yards., Pulliam, P., & Walker, D. J. (2007). Computing and you will Promoting Publicity international Exchange Heart Fitness Registry. Analytics in the Drug, 26(8), 1688–1701.

Murray, J. S. (2016). Probabilistic checklist linkage and you can deduplication shortly after indexing, clogging, and you will filtering. Journal of Privacy and you will Privacy, 7(1), 3–24.

Newcombe, H. B., Kennedy, J. Meters., Axford, S. J., & James, An effective. P. (1959). Automatic linkage out of public record information machines are often used to extract” follow-up” analytics from parents out of data regarding regimen suggestions. Research, 130(3381), 954–959.

Sadinle, Meters. (2014). Discovering Duplicates from inside the a murder Registry Playing with good Bayesian Partitioning Means. Annals of Used Statistics, 8(4), 2404–2434.

Sariyar, Meters., Borg, An effective., & Pommerening, K. (2012). Effective Reading Tricks for the fresh new Deduplication from Electronic Patient Investigation Having fun with Classification Woods. Diary of Biomedical Informatics, 45(5), 893–900.

C., Hallway, Roentgen., & Fienberg, S. E. (2016). A Bayesian Method of Graphical Listing Linkage and you will Deduplication. Diary of your own American Mathematical Organization, 111(516), 1660–1672.

Tancredi, A., & Liseo, B. (2011). Good hierarchical Bayesian approach to list linkage and you may populace dimensions trouble. Annals away from Used Statistics, 5(2B), 1553–1585.